Call Us Freephone:

03335 77 66 55

Opening Hours:

Mon–Fri 9:00am to 5:00pm

OSCAR Onsite | Independent Technical Evidence

TrustMark Consultation 2026

Building Stronger Protection for Home Improvement Customers

OSCAR Onsite has prepared a detailed response to TrustMark’s 2026 consultation, drawing upon experience in cavity wall insulation surveying, extraction, technical monitoring, training, independent clearance certification and the investigation of defective retrofit installations.

This resource brings together OSCAR’s recommendations, historical expert evidence and supporting material to encourage informed discussion about consumer protection, accountability and the long-term performance of home energy-efficiency measures.

Consultation deadline
27 October 2026
Submission status
Draft response
Enquiries
office@oscar-onsite.co.uk

Document Library

Consultation Documents and Supporting Evidence

The following documents provide the original consultation context, OSCAR’s response and historical technical and legal analysis relevant to cavity wall insulation failures.

Official consultation External source

Building Stronger Protection for Home Improvement Customers

TrustMark's published consultation setting out proposed changes to registration, oversight, consumer complaints, financial protection and associated scheme arrangements.

Publisher
TrustMark
Date
2026
Document type
Official consultation
OSCAR Onsite Ltd — Formal consultation submission OSCAR Onsite response

Main Consultation Response

OSCAR Onsite — Response to the TrustMark Consultation 2026

51 pages · 26 October 2026 · PDF

OSCAR's detailed examination of the proposed changes, supported by practical experience and recommendations concerning independent oversight, insulation quality, consumer protection, financial guarantees, technical monitoring and environmental accountability.

Accompanying Q1–Q20 Response

OSCAR Onsite — Formal Responses to Consultation Questions 1–20

6 pages · 26 October 2026 · PDF

Expert evidence Historical evidence

Cavity Wall Insulation Failure — Energy Report

Public copy — personal information redacted

A specialist report examining the relationship between cavity wall insulation failure, anticipated energy savings, thermal performance and potential additional heating costs. Prepared in connection with an individual property and based upon specified supporting information and assumptions.

Publisher
Max A. Krangle
Date
2018
Document type
Historical expert energy report
Pages
31
File size
678 KB
This is a historical expert report prepared in 2018. Its conclusions and calculations relate to the circumstances, evidence and assumptions identified in the report. It should not be treated as a finding applicable to every property.
Legal advice Historical evidence

In the Matter of Expert Energy Reports in Cavity Wall Insulation Claims

Legal advice considering the distinction between expert evidence concerning physical remedial works and evidence relating to potential energy or heating losses, together with associated issues of recoverability and proportionality.

Publisher
Erica Bedford, King’s Chambers
Date
14 June 2018
Document type
Historical counsel’s advice
Pages
5
File size
113 KB
This document is counsel's advice dated 14 June 2018. It is not a court judgment or a determination of any individual homeowner's entitlement to compensation.

Featured Evidence — Energy Loss

When Insulation Fails, What Happens to the Promised Energy Savings?

Homeowners are encouraged to install cavity wall insulation on the understanding that it will reduce heat loss and heating costs.

Where insulation is unsuitable, defective, incomplete, degraded or affected by moisture, the anticipated benefits may not be achieved. In some circumstances, associated defects and moisture-related deterioration can contribute to poorer thermal performance and increased heating demand.

The question is not simply whether the insulation should be removed. It is also whether the homeowner has experienced a measurable financial loss associated with reduced energy performance.

The 2018 Max Krangle report is presented here as a historical example of specialist analysis addressing these questions. Its calculations depend on the property-specific evidence and assumptions identified within the report itself, and it does not establish a universal loss figure that applies to other properties.

Read the full energy report

Predicted savings and actual energy performance are not the same thing.

Featured Evidence — Counsel’s Advice

Are Energy Losses Separate from Physical Remedial Costs?

In June 2018, counsel at Kings Chambers considered whether energy or heating losses arising from alleged cavity wall insulation failure could be treated separately from the physical costs of repairing a property.

The advice distinguished between the expertise required to assess building defects and remedial works, and the expertise required to assess energy-related losses.

It also considered the legal and procedural requirements relevant to the recoverability of expert evidence and associated costs.

Physical Remedial Works

Investigation and repair of defects, dampness and building-fabric damage.

Energy Performance

Assessment of anticipated savings, heating demand and possible additional energy costs.

Evidence and Recoverability

The need for appropriate expertise, causation evidence and consideration of the circumstances of each claim.

Read the original Kings Chambers advice

This document is counsel’s advice and not a binding legal precedent, a court judgment or an established ruling. It does not determine any individual homeowner’s entitlement to compensation.

The Environmental Cost of Failed Insulation

What Happens to Insulation After Extraction?

When cavity wall insulation is removed, the extracted material becomes a waste stream requiring appropriate containment, transportation and management.

Although mineral wool may be described as recyclable, there is an important distinction between clean manufacturing or construction offcuts and wet, degraded or contaminated insulation recovered from existing cavity walls.

The existence of recycled content in newly manufactured insulation does not establish that extracted domestic cavity wall insulation is being recycled.

OSCAR considers that the final destinations of extracted insulation should be properly recorded and independently verifiable.

Recyclable in principle does not necessarily mean recycled in practice.

Why the waste trail matters

Waste transfer records

Documentation recording what was removed from site, in what quantity, and where it was taken.

Authorised waste facilities

Confirmation that material was received by a suitably permitted or authorised facility.

Actual recovery outcomes

Evidence of what was genuinely recovered or recycled, rather than what is theoretically possible.

Landfill data

Accurate records where material could not be recovered, so the true environmental cost is visible.

OSCAR does not claim that all extracted insulation goes to landfill, nor that every insulation manufacturer rejects every category of recovered material. The point is that the actual destination of extracted insulation should be recorded and verifiable rather than assumed.

OSCAR’s Recommendations

What OSCAR Is Calling For

An overview of the principal themes raised in OSCAR’s response. These are topic summaries, not a replacement for the complete numbered recommendations in the full consultation response.

  • Independent assessment and technical monitoring.
  • Improved property suitability and installation checks.
  • Stronger consumer complaints and redress procedures.
  • Transparent guarantee-provider oversight.
  • Independent extraction clearance verification.
  • Better records of insulation installations and removals.
  • Appropriate professional competence and training.
  • Assessment of actual energy-performance losses.
  • Traceability of extracted insulation waste.
  • Improved identification of risks in non-traditional construction.

The numbered recommendations, and the reasoning supporting them, are set out in full in OSCAR’s consultation response.

Read All Recommendations in OSCAR’s Full Response

About OSCAR Onsite

About OSCAR Onsite

OSCAR Onsite provides specialist services relating to cavity wall insulation surveying, extraction oversight, technical monitoring, independent clearance certification, professional training and contractor accreditation.

Through its work with homeowners, surveyors, contractors and other stakeholders, OSCAR seeks to improve competence, transparency and accountability in the assessment and remediation of cavity wall insulation.

Consultation Updates

Consultation Updates and Developments

Entries are labelled to distinguish published events, editorial preparation and scheduled dates. This page is not used to publish unverified developments.

  • TrustMark published its consultation 'Building Stronger Protection for Home Improvement Customers'. The consultation is the subject of OSCAR Onsite's response.

Anticipated updates — not yet published

  • OSCAR’s confirmed submission date
  • Revised evidence or supplementary statements
  • TrustMark’s consultation outcome
  • Relevant changes to consumer protection arrangements
  • Further technical evidence published by OSCAR

Contact and Further Information

Questions About Cavity Wall Insulation or Independent Inspection?

If you are a homeowner, surveyor, contractor, solicitor or housing professional seeking information about cavity wall insulation inspection, extraction clearance or related technical services, OSCAR Onsite can assist.

OSCAR Onsite Ltd

Enquiries from this page are handled under OSCAR Onsite’s existing privacy policy and contact procedures.